#Eragon the movie watch tv#
With reboots of classic TV shows like iCarly or Gossip Girl, it’s safe to say that we’re all just getting a little bit nostalgic.
#Eragon the movie watch series#
It seems that these days, every old TV show, movie, or book series is getting a second chance.
Will there be a remake of the disaster of the original movie? Find out if there’s a chance for an Eragon redemption here.īring the thunder Alagaësians! Let hear you roar! Use the hashtag #EragonRemake, mention in the body of the tweet, and let them know we want to see a proper Eragon adaptation! Over a decade after the release of the movie, however, there seems to be a spark of hope for long-time, loyal Eragon fans. While it was initially planned to be a franchise, the Eragon movie was so poorly received by both fans of the book series as well as critics that it was left behind in the dust. It currently holds a low score of sixteen percent on Rotten Tomatoes with a forty-six percent audience score, and thirty-eight percent on Metacritic. However, while it did make $250.4 million dollars at the box office with a 100 million dollar budget, the film ended up being an entire mess. The movie Eragon came out in 2006 and was highly anticipated by fans of the series. However, just like Percy Jackson, while the books were widely popular, the movie was not as well-received. Following the popularity of other book series like Harry Potter, Narnia, The Lord of the Rings, and more, Eragon was also so well-loved that it was eventually developed for the big screen. If you remember Eragon, then we’re sure you must understand just how iconic of a book series it was when it first came out. A very bad film indeed and one that I'd rather rate with zero, but I'll through a half a star Robert Carlyle's way.By: Joyce Chang Disney has remade ‘Eragon’: Reminisce about the original movie The only positive that can be taken from this is that due to it's box-office and critical failure, we will probably be spared the adaptations to the rest of the series. This is one, and quite possibly the definitive to those exceptions. Normally a fantasy yarn has something to hold your interest - no matter how poor - but it just goes to show there are exceptions to that. The same goes for Carlyle but he still manages to deliver a decidedly nasty villian that's way above this nonsense.
You get the impression from Irons and Malkovich that they know they've made a mistake with this one. Speelers doesn't really cut it as the hero of the tale, lacking charisma and any form of acting ability and the rest of the cast seem perplexed.
Although some were impressed with the special effects, I didn't find them to be anything special. It made no effort to even look like the dragon was communicating and just came across as cheap and insulting. Admittedly, I've never read the books, leaving me unsure as to how the adaptation should be but I do know this. This was also based on a series of books by Christopher Paolini but it's not even in the same league as some of the quality we've recently been spoiled with. If your going to release a fantasy film these days then make sure it has some mileage, as "The Lord of the Rings" has set a very high benchmark. Young farmer Eragon (Ed Speleers) finds a dragon's egg, and teams up with the newborn dragon, Saphira (voiced by Rachel Weisz), a former Dragon Rider (Jeremy Irons) and a female Elf (Sienna Guillory) to tackle an evil king (John Malkovich) and his shady accomplice (Robert Carlyle).īad dialogue, bad acting, bad movie. Seriously though, I wish I'd listened to the naysayers now.
However, I eventually thought I should still give it go and see for myself. I enjoy a good fantastical story but I had avoided this one due to the bad things I'd heard of it.